This article aims to contribute to the open question of why AJ is often rejected by professionals in the newsrooms, especially journalists, and which factors are perceived to be crucial for the rejection. However, given the clear economic benefits of the technology, Automated journalism is only adopted in a minority of newsrooms and has still very limited fields of use. Automated journalism (AJ) enables the fast production of numerous articles in real-time and in various languages. Purpose: Automation in journalistic processes is increasingly being discussed in media research and practice. It shows, however, more difficulty when coming to moral rights, especially in Common Law countries. Still, there is a place for more authorial, personal rights. We propose a shorter term of duration before entering public domain. Our main conclusion is that the economics intellectual property rights are guaranteed in any case through collective works. Sui generis and neighboring rights are also considered for examination as being appliable to AIS-aided news outputs. Using comparative legal methods, we examine the implications of them for some legal categories, such as authorship (and hence required originality) and types of works, namely collaborative, derivative and, most especially, collective works. This can affect the application of intellectual property and copyright law in many ways. #Wotja commercial use software#It comprises a variety of practices in which the use of data, software and human intervention is involved in diverse degrees. Automated news, or artificial intelligence systems (AIS)-aided production of news items, has been developed from 2010 onwards.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |